Scientific Study
Access to over 2,900 scientific references, studies and publications. This section is constantly updated with studies that have been published in scientific journals.
Products: Peanuts
Notice: Undefined variable: post in /home/nimianet/domains/test.nimia.net/public_html/wp-content/mu-plugins/custom-studies.php on line 744
Notice: Trying to get property 'ID' of non-object in /home/nimianet/domains/test.nimia.net/public_html/wp-content/mu-plugins/custom-studies.php on line 744
A randomized controlled study of peanut oral immunotherapy: Clinical desensitization and modulation of the allergic response
Authors: Varshney P, Jones SM, Scurlock AM, Perry TT, Kemper A, Steele P, Hiegel A, Kamilaris J, Carlisle S, Yue X, Kulis M, Pons L, Vickery B, Burks AW
- Journals: J Allergy Clin Immunol
- Pages: 654-60
- Volume: Mar:127 (3)
- Year: 2011
Notice: Undefined variable: post in /home/nimianet/domains/test.nimia.net/public_html/wp-content/mu-plugins/custom-articles.php on line 247
Notice: Trying to get property 'ID' of non-object in /home/nimianet/domains/test.nimia.net/public_html/wp-content/mu-plugins/custom-articles.php on line 247
Abstract BACKGROUND: Open-label oral immunotherapy (OIT) protocols have been used to treat small numbers of patients with peanut allergy. Peanut OIT has not been evaluated in double-blind; placebo-controlled trials. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the safety and effectiveness of OIT for peanut allergy in a double-blind; placebo-controlled study. METHODS: In this multicenter study; children ages 1 to 16 years with peanut allergy received OIT with peanut flour or placebo. Initial escalation; build-up; and maintenance phases were followed by an oral food challenge (OFC) at approximately 1 year. Titrated skin prick tests (SPTs) and laboratory studies were performed at regular intervals. RESULTS: Twenty-eight subjects were enrolled in the study. Three peanut OIT subjects withdrew early in the study because of allergic side effects. During the double-blind; placebo-controlled food challenge; all remaining peanut OIT subjects (n = 16) ingested the maximum cumulative dose of 5000 mg (approximately 20 peanuts); whereas placebo subjects (n = 9) ingested a median cumulative dose of 280 mg (range; 0-1900 mg; P < .001). In contrast with the placebo group; the peanut OIT group showed reductions in SPT size (P < .001); IL-5 (P = .01); and IL-13 (P = .02) and increases in peanut-specific IgG(4) (P < .001). Peanut OIT subjects had initial increases in peanut-specific IgE (P < .01) but did not show significant change from baseline by the time of OFC. The ratio of forkhead box protein 3 (FoxP3)(hi): FoxP3(intermediate) CD4+ CD25+T cells increased at the time of OFC (P=04) in peanut OIT subjects. CONCLUSION: These results conclusively demonstrate that peanut OIT induces desensitization and concurrent immune modulation. The current study continues and is evaluating the hypothesis that peanut OIT causes long-term immune tolerance.